JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 7, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Sociedad Minas Paz Del Rio S.A.

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional
  • Rechazar por extemporánea
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-341/16.

La Sociedad Paz del Río S.A. pidió a la Corporación aclarar el numeral tercero de la parte resolutiva de la providencia de la referencia, en relación con el alcance de la orden de realizar las adecuaciones técnicas y a dar cumplimiento a los requerimientos de las autoridades ambientales y mineras.

Se RECHAZA, por extemporánea, la solicitud formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por extemporánea la solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-341 de 2016, presentada por los apoderados de la sociedad Minas Paz del Río SA.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia a la sociedad Minas Paz del Río SA, con la advertencia que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.